What if hotels billed like hospitals?

Costs of Care put out a a viral video today to help announce a new curriculum being developed to help trainees learn how to make value-based medical decisions. What do you think?

Costs of Care Essay Contest!

Medical bills are a leading cause of personal bankruptcy and health care providers decide what goes on the bill.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the United States spends $700 billion dollars each year on tests and treatments that do not measurably improve health outcomes--a figure comparable to our total spending on the Iraq War. And here is where things become truly awkward: few providers understand how the decisions they make impact what patients pay for care.

Let's recap. Medical bills are bankrupting Americans, providers decide what goes on the bill ($700 billion dollars of which might not need to be there), and providers rarely have information about what things cost. That seems like something we ought to fix, doesn't it?

If you agree and have a story to tell about it, there could be $1000 in it for you. Remember a time you got a medical bill that was higher than you expected it to be? Or a time when you wanted to know how much a test or treatment might cost and couldn't find out? Costs of Care, a Boston-based nonprofit, is offering $1000 for short anecdotes illustrating the importance of cost awareness in medicine. We want to hear your story.

The submissions will be judged by a high profile crew of policymakers, doctors, and journalists that include Atul Gawande, Michael Dukakis, Jeffrey Flier, Michael Leavitt, and Tim Johnson. Submissions will be due by November 1st to contest@costsofcare.org. Additional details are available at www.costsofcare.org/essay

Dr. Neel Shah is the executive director of www.CostsOfCare.org, and a resident in Obstetrics and Gynecology at Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston.

Healthcare Reform and End-of-Life Costs

When President Obama's chief budget deputy Peter Orzag announced the stimulus bill (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009), he mentioned that the U.S. spends $700 billion each year on medical tests that don't help patients get healthier.

Policy analysts have long known that much of this seemingly wasteful spending occurs during emotionally challenging moments at the end of life. We often are willing to spend the most on those who are the sickest--even when it is unlikely to make them better. Given the highly sensitive situations involved, most politicians have been reluctant to touch this issue with a ten foot poll.

At least until now.

The recent healthcare bill drafted by the House takes on the costs of end-of-life care heads-on by providing doctors with financial incentives to counsel patients on creating "advanced directives" (commonly known as "Do Not Rescusitate/Do Not Intubate" orders). Since many patients can be sustained indefinitely on ICU life-support, the bill is meant to save money by reducing so-called "futile care".

However, the normally sympathetic editorial staff of the Washington Post has taken issue with this aspect of the bill, on the grounds that it is unethical to put financial rewards and end-of-life counseling in such close proximity.

What do you think? Join the conversation here or on Facebook