This summer, while I was traveling around Ghana conducting clinical quality and management research focusing specifically on the changes posting an OB/GYN specialist in district hospitals has on the hospital and the immediate community, my classmate Charlotte was busy administering a laparoscopic surgery training module to bring the technology of laparoscopy to Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Laparoscopic surgery, especially for gynecological surgeries, has been available to developed countries for at least 20 years, but this minimally invasive form of surgery has yet to become standard practice in Ghana. The benefits of laparoscopic surgery are many. It is cosmetically favored by patients and medically, reduces complications like hemorrhaging and has shorter recovery times. It is no exaggeration to say that Charlotte's work is ushering Ghana into a new surgical future that will bring a tremendous amount of public health benefit.
In 1910, Abraham Flexner's report titled, "Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching" ushered and shaped medical education into it's current form. The Flexner Report called for standardization of medical education that was rooted in sound and rigorous biomedical and clinical science challenging the American and Canadian medical education systems to train the highest quality of physicians. Flexner, not a physician himself, wrote a book-length report that was framed with the greater society in mind. He wrote, "The public interest is then paramount, and when public interest, professional ideals, and sound educational procedure concur in the recommendation of the same policy, the time is surely ripe for decisive action."
It has been 100 years since the publication of the Flexner Report and with 100 years of experience of modern medical education, we are due for some reflection on the alignment of the medical education system and the public interest. In an article published in Academic Medicine, Drs. Don Berwick and Jon Finkelstein write and discuss a, let's call it "Flexner Report 2.0", shaping a medical education system that will better prepare physicians to meet the needs of a today's world of health care. Read the article here.
In the article Berwick and Finkelstein outline new values that should complement the current emphasis on biomedical science we receive in medical school. These values include "patient-centeredness, transparency, and stewardship of limited societal resources for health care." There is no time in the current curriculum to add on training in these new skills, many educators would argue. Berwick and Finkelstein also review the innovative programs, including the IHI Open School, that attempt to provide medical students and residents with a foundation in these new skills, as well as outlining a new frame of reference for medical curriculum change that will incorporate these invaluable skills. I certainly can't reproduce Berwick and Finkelstein's eloquence, so I will leave the explanation of the fine details to the article. Definitely a must-read!
In the 100 years since the publication of the Flexner Report, the medical education system has trained millions of physicians who have dramatically transformed health care. It was this cohort of physicians that popularized laparoscopic surgery! Looking just at performance outcomes, we have made incredible gains in both the length and quality of life for our patients. However, there is much more we can do. If we adopt Berwick and Finkelstein's recommendations, we will be poised to create a new physician workforce adept at navigating and continually improving the complexities of health care to consistently meet patient needs. We all need to collectively reflect on and brainstorm innovative interventions to fold the skills of systems thinking into our current medical education system. If we can develop the technology of laparoscopic surgery, I'm confident that we too can succeed in reinventing ourselves to better treat our patients with the tools of quality improvement. In 100 years, the world will surely look very different. I'm imagining a modern metropolis not unlike the life of the Jetsons. But, what will medicine look like? What kinds of public health accomplishments can we celebrate in the next 100 years? Let's work together to reshape medical education so that we will have plenty to celebrate in the future!
What do you think of the Berwick and Finkelstein paper? Leave a comment!
Posts
